Is Macbeth a machiavellian character? Essay

for how we live is so far take from how we ought to live, that he who abandons what is done for what ought to be done, will alternatively learn to bring well-nigh his own wrecking than his preservation.(Machiavelli 12) This is a quote from Machiavellis The Prince. This is provided one belief of Machiavelli, which, many great loss leaders perk up been known to use. Have you ever legal opinion ab egress a leader that possessed these qualities that was from a play? Shakespeares char subroutineer Macbeth represents the Machiavellian musical theme that a ruler should count well in public, be smart and upstanding, and do what is necessary to take over onto role. Shakespeare use imagery, and metaphors to portray Macbeth this way because, although he dies in the finish up, Macbeth still used Machiavellis imagels, and was successful in many ways.Both Machiavelli and Shakespeare knew that it matters how a leader portrays himself to the public. Machiavelli judgment that it was im portant for a leader to appear to be good in public, and cut through his bad qualities from his people. he should visualizem to be all mercy, faith, integrity, humanity, and religion.Everybody sees what you appear to be, few feel what you are, and those few will non dare oppose themselves to the many. (Machiavelli 15) Machiavelli used enunciation to portray what a leader should be interchange commensu yard in the old ages, such as having mercy, faith, and religion. He in like manner says that you should at least pretend to attest some of these qualities to your people. As Machiavelli writes, Macbeth talks about cin one caseal his dark self to the world.MACBETH aside The Prince of Cumberland-that is a step/ On which Imust fall down or else oerleap/ For in my way it lies. Stars hide your fires / permit not light see my black and oceanic abyss desires/ The eye wink at the hand to date be/ Which the eye fears, when it is dont to see. (1.4 49-54)Like Machiavellis idea to hide your deceptive self, Macbeth reassures himself to do so. Macbeths use of metaphors such as light versus dark, emphasized good versus bad. Macbeth cleanly states that he has an immoral side that he is trying to hide form everyone else, and in doing so he believes he will gain more creator, and the trust of his people. wrote to frustrate the attention to people, and they both knew the importance of how a leadershould act.Both Machiavelli and Shakespeare knew that rulers need to be able to do whatsoever is necessary to benefit himself, or the state. Machiavelli also believed that a ruler must do whatever is necessary, good or bad to benefit himself or his state yet you must hand over the headspring so disposed that when it is needful to be other you may be able to change to the paired qualities.And therefore, he must have a consciousness disposed to adapt itself according to the wind, and as the variations of heap dictate and, as I said before, not deviate from what is good, if possible just now able to do evil if constrained. (Machiavelli 15)Machiavellis ideal pertains to this utilisation of Macbeth doing what he necessarily to do in distinguish to gain power for himself, by the murder of male monarch Duncan. MACBETH I go, and it is done. The bell invites me./ Hear it not Duncan, for it is a knell/ That summons thee to heaven or inferno. (2.1 62-64) Machiavellis ideal is entern through Macbeths thinking on his murder of King Duncan. He is employ an apostrophe to say to King Duncan that he will not hear the bells because he is dead. He is talking about this because, he knew that he essential to get unblock of him, or else he would not have been able to gain power. As this specific incident shows Macbeth is utilize a Machiavellian ideal to push himself, and his power further.Shakespeare and Machiavelli knew that rulers should have wit and bravery to really have control of their power. Machiavelli believed that a ruler should be smart, sly, brave, and strong to dismay away those who would challenge his power.A prince universe thus obliged to know well how to act as a beast must obey the fox and the lion, for the lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot reserve himself from the wolves. One must therefore be a fox to recognize traps, and a lion to frighten wolves. (Machiavelli14)Machiavelli uses imagery/ symbolism to show animals being accredited qualityistics, the fox being wit and slyness, and the lion aptitude and bravery. Just as Machiavelli wrote, his rule applies to Macbeths character in this quote.MACBETH Who can be wise, amazed, temprate and furious, / Loyal and neutral in a endorsement? No man,/ Thexpidition of my convulsive love/ Outran the pauser reason. present lay Duncan,/ His silver skin laced with his palmy blood,/ And his gashed stabs looked like a breach in constitution/ For ruins wasteful entrance there the murderers,/ Steeped in the color of their trade, their daggers/ Unm annerly breeched with gore. Who could refrain/ That had a center to love, and in hat heart/ Courage to shop loves known. (2.3 105-115)As Machiavelli wrote Macbeth is showing this idea. He is victimisation his wit to say he killed to guards out of violent love for the king. This quick witty response not only added to the trust from people around him, but also it stopped the guards from coming back to entertain themselves, and challenge Macbeth. Macbeth used imagery of Duncans body, which was so perfect and royal lying dead, still looking perfect and regal. Macbeth used this to make it seem that he loved King Duncan so much and he looked up so highly of him, he needed to kill the guards after what he they had done. Both Shakespeare and Machiavelli used imagery to show what a ruler needs in order to hold onto power.Macbeth tarrys many qualities of a Machiavellian ruler, he may not inhabit all, but of the majority he does, because he appears well, hes smart and brave, and he knows what he needs to do to keep power. Shakespeare used Machiavellis beliefs to show what a Machiavellian ruler would be like, but in his case it didnt turn out successfully for him in the end, because he lost the principal(prenominal) idea of Machiavellis ideas.This is because Macbeth was able to do feral things to benefit himself on his way to power, but once he had the power, he lost the main idea of keeping that power, and he went mental. If Macbeth had kept a clear view of exactly what he wanted, and didnt go a little insane with guilt wherefore he would have been able to avoid the end tragedy of his death. Do you think the play Macbeth would have ended thesame if Macbeth had been able to accept the detail that his cruel deeds were going to further his power and his state?